Home | About us | Campaigns | MisaNet | Media Releases | Events | Mailing List | Awards | Mail Box | Jobs | Contact us

Programmes
Freedom of Expression
Broadcasting
Media Monitoring
Gender & Media Support
Legal Support
   
Chapters
Angola
Botswana
Lesotho
Malawi
Mozambique
Namibia
South Africa
Swaziland
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
   
Research & Publications
So This is Democracy
Free Press
Undue Restriction
Gender Media Study
Licenscing in SADC
MISA Constitution
Annual Report
Media Directory

MISA-Zimbabwe statement on proposed ICT Bill

MISA-Zimbabwe notes current efforts by the Attorney-General’s Office to develop an Information Communication Technologies (ICT) Bill through the circulation of a questionnaire which among other considerations seeks to identify shortfalls in ICT related legislation in Zimbabwe.

The Posts and Telecommunications Act, Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA) and the Broadcasting Services Act (BSA) are identified as some of the laws that will be taken into consideration towards the development of a national ICT Bill. The questionnaire therefore seeks to establish whether the three laws in question have overlapping functions and whether it is possible to consolidate them into one Act.

It is MISA-Zimbabwe’s strong submission that in their present state the laws in question and BSA and AIPPA in particular, do not even meet the benchmarks for the enactment of a progressive and democratic national ICT legislation more so as it relates to the establishment of an independent converged broadcasting, ICT, cellular and telecommunications regulatory authority.

The long term viability of the broadcasting, telecommunications and ICT sectors lies in securing the independence of their regulatory frameworks. The argument for the independence of regulators in the field of telecoms, broadcasting and technological convergence is guided by several regional and continental covenants such as the African Charter on Broadcasting (ACB), African Union (AU) Declaration on Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa and the SADC Protocol on Culture, Information and Sport.

The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) is hailed as a model independent regulator on the continent. It is MISA-Zimbabwe’s argument that the manner in which the Zimbabwean regulators namely the Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe (BAZ) under the BSA, the Posts and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe, and Media and Information Commission under AIPPA, are constituted makes them susceptible to direct political interference. AIPPA through the MIC imposes statutory regulation in breach of the Banjul Declaration on the Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa while BAZ is hostage to the whims and dictates of the Executive in violation of the African Charter on Broadcasting.
These bodies need to be replaced by a truly independent communications regulator that will oversee these sectors. This new regulator’s independence must be guaranteed by the law and must have financial, structural and functional independence in order to regulate the sector effectively and impartially for the development of the ICT sector to be guaranteed.

It is MISA-Zimbabwe’s submission that regulation should be undertaken for purposes of promoting freedom of speech and access to information. The extent to which a country is said to be democratic is the extent to which it is seen to actively promote free expression and communication between the people and their leaders through such institutions as the media.

We posit that one of the ways of promoting free expression and communication is through the creation of an enabling environment for media freedom through, among other considerations, establishing a truly independent regulator to regulate the country’s communications sector in the public interest, free of any political, commercial or individual self-interest.

It is therefore, MISA- Zimbabwe’s humble submissions that the Attorney General Office and the government in general in its quest to come up with a national ICT Bill should be guided by the following principles that govern the operations of independent regulatory bodies:
there should be clear separation of powers, with the government being responsible for policy development, an independent body being responsible for the implementation of policies and regulating the sector whilst privately owned media concentrates on service provision.
regulation should be done in the public interest, with the aim of: creating and maintaining order in the sector, establishing fair competition and quality service, promoting free speech, access to information as well as consumer protection.
providing distinct legal mandate of the regulator’s duties and responsibilities, free of ministerial, commercial or private control.
Involving every one, that is, the executive, legislature, civic society, business and the general public in the appointment process of the regulator’s board.

Nyasha Nyakunu
Research and Information Officer
MISA-Zimbabwe
84 McChlery Drive
Eastlea
Harare
Zimbabwe
Telefax: +263 4 776165/746838
Cell: +263 11 602 448
Email: misa@misazim.co.zw
Website: www.misazim.co.zw

Back

Downloads
  Workshops
  SPP
  AGM Resolution
  Gender, HIV/AIDS & Poverty
  Zimbabwe Report
   
Other Links
  SADC Newspaper
  SADC Broadcaster
  MISA Partners
   
World News
  AllAfrica.com
  BBC
  CNN
  SADC
  SARDC
  IRIN
  VOA
© 2008 Media Institute of Southern Africa : promoting media diversity . pluralism . self-sufficiency . independence.
All rights reserved.
Disclaimer: The newspapers' contents on the links and all other related materials hosted on our site are products and sole responsibility of respective publishers and do not necessarily represent the views of MISA nor its employees.