Home | About us | Campaigns | MisaNet | Media Releases | Events | Mailing List | Awards | Mail Box | Jobs | Contact us

Programmes
Freedom of Expression
Broadcasting
Media Monitoring
Gender & Media Support
Legal Support
   
Chapters
Angola
Botswana
Lesotho
Malawi
Mozambique
Namibia
South Africa
Swaziland
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
   
Research & Publications
So This is Democracy
Free Press
Undue Restriction
Gender Media Study
Licenscing in SADC
MISA Constitution
Annual Report
Media Directory

Coalition Statement on the 'Save our SABC Campaign'

BroadcastingAmendment Bill goes through final Parliamentary stages Pressstatement 16October 2008 Today [16 October 2008] theNational Council of Provinces will be holding deliberations on the BroadcastingAmendment Bill. The “Save our SABC” Campaign, representing COSATU,the Treatment Action Campaign, a host of NGOs and CBOs including the Freedom ofExpression Institute, the Media Monitoring Project, and the Media Institute ofSouthern Africa have welcomed the Bill.

We believe that it deals with majorgaps around the removal of Board members in the present Broadcasting Act, 1999.The present Act only allows for the removal of individual Board members on therecommendation of the Board itself, which is clearly inadequate. However,although a number of positive amendments have been made to the Bill, a numberof clauses remain problematic including present appointment procedures,failures to distinguish between executive and non-executive members to theBoard, lack of criteria for the interim Board, and quorum issues.

Separation of powers Given the urgent need toattend to the above issues the Coalition is disappointed that so much attentionhas been paid to the so-called “separation of powers” debates. Both the SABC and someother groupings are of the opinion that appointments to the SABC Board areessentially an executive function and that having the Speaker of Parliamentbeing part of the “appointing body” is a violation of theConstitutional principles of separation of powers. We, the Coalition, are ofthe view that the concept of separation of powers has very little applicationwhen it comes to the appointment of members of Boards of bodies such as theSABC.

It is a universally accepted principle, in terms of international bestpractise, that the executive alone should never appoint the members tothe Boards of public broadcasters precisely because of the danger toindependence that such purely executive appointments pose. For the Coalition, the criticalissue is that a multi-party representative body, such as Parliament, has to becentrally involved in the appointments process in such a way as to guardagainst executive interference in appointments to the SABC Board.

Thus, wesupport the Bill’s provisions that non-executive members of the bothordinary and interim boards of the SABC must be nominated by Parliament andthat such nominations ought to be binding on the appointing body. In our view, it makeslittle difference, either way, as to who, in fact, makes such appointmentsofficially i.e. the President or the President acting jointly with the Speaker.The issues that we believe are of greater importance include the following:

  • The Bill does not adequatelyaddress the problems around the appointments of SABC Board members which gaverise to the current crises in the first place. Consequently the Bill will notaddress these crises.
  • The Bill does not distinguishbetween the appointment/removal processes for executive and non-executivemembers of the Board rendering the Bill’s attempt to deal with thecurrent crises at the SABC futile, in particular, the proposed interim boardwill be inoperable unless such distinctions are properly made. In our view,executive appointments, ought to be made by the non-executive members of theBoard only – a view, shared by the Minister as evidenced in recent courtpapers. This matter is a critical flaw in the current Broadcasting Act and mustbe addressed.
  • The Bill does not currentlyprovide for any criteria for the interim Board. This, in our view, is FAR moreserious than the whether or not the Speaker plays a role in their appointment.The public has to know that only suitably qualified people can be appointed toan interim Board position.
  • The Bill does not change thequorum provisions of the Broadcasting Act and as a result the interim boardwill not constitute a quorate board and will therefore be unableto operate. Unless these four issuesare properly addressed by Parliament before passing the Bill, the Bill will beunworkable and the current crises will remain unresolved, further weakening theSABC and damaging the public interest in the process.

Formore information contact:

Kate Skinner Campaign Coordinator
(082) 926-6404
Prakashnee Govender Cosatu Parliamentary Office
(021) 461-3835William Bird
Media Monitoring Project
(082) 887-1370
Faiza Smith Misa-SA
(076) 995-9513

Rashweat Mukundu
Programme Specialist: Media Freedom Monitoring
MISA Regional Secretariat
21 Johann Albrecht Street
Private Bag 13386
Windhoek, Namibia
Tel: + 264 61 232 975
Fax:+264 61 248016
Mobile: 00 264 813 675 362
E mail rashweat@misa.org, misaalerts@gmail.com

Back

Downloads
  Workshops
  SPP
  AGM Resolution
  Gender, HIV/AIDS & Poverty
  Zimbabwe Report
   
Other Links
  SADC Newspaper
  SADC Broadcaster
  MISA Partners
   
World News
  AllAfrica.com
  BBC
  CNN
  SADC
  SARDC
  IRIN
  VOA
© 2008 Media Institute of Southern Africa : promoting media diversity . pluralism . self-sufficiency . independence.
All rights reserved.
Disclaimer: The newspapers' contents on the links and all other related materials hosted on our site are products and sole responsibility of respective publishers and do not necessarily represent the views of MISA nor its employees.