|
|
|
WAPC SAYS ZAMBIA PROPOSALS
FOR STATUTORY MEDIA REGULATION UNNECESSARY & UNDEMOCRATIC
Recently some members of Zambia’s Parliament have proposed
creation of a statutory body for regulation of the media. In
addition, this government control of media is said to be necessary
for passage of a Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill.The WAPC views
these proposals as threats to democracy and to basic human rights
as set forth in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights:
|
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion
and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions
without interference and to seek, receive and impart information
and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
According to Chris Conybeare, Secretary General of the WAPC; “Zambia
is positioned to be a leader among African nations in the struggle
for democracy. The proposals for media regulation and denial
of FOI legislation, on its own merits, are a giant step backward.
“
These proposals evidence no faith in the ability of Zambia’s
citizens to sort out conflicting views and process information.
When government starts saying, ‘we are in a superior position
to the citizenry with regard to information.’ it sets foot
on the slippery slope toward thought control and emulates the
mindset of colonial rule.”
As these proposals appear to be an emotional response to recent
election coverage, we note that there are ample laws on the books
with regard to election coverage.
We also note that modern democracies require robust FOI procedures.
Such laws are almost a requirement for international trade and
business dealings. FOI should not be held hostage to media regulation.
We join with the leading media associations of Zambia and urge
Parliamentarians to reverse their decision to support statutory
regulation, to support the self-regulation movement through the
Media Council of Zambia (MECOZ), and to support FOI legislation
without statutory media control.
Back
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|