The newspapers had refused to publish the advertisement in their classified "Deaths" and "Personal" sections, Hodgson said.
"Freedom of speech seems to be undermined when newspaper editors censor obituary notices and refuse to give appropriate media coverage to the hidden holocaust of 900 000 South African babies killed by abortion," said Hodgson.

The Cape Times and Cape Argus had refused to publish CAN's anti-abortion advertisements for the past four years, she said. However, Die Burger and The Citizen newspapers had no qualms about publishing the advertisements in their "Deaths" sections. Independent Newspapers editor-in-chief Chris Whitfield said the advertisements had been refused because it would be inappropriate to publish the anti-abortion obituary in the "Deaths" section.

Such advertisements would violate the "sensibilities for people who use the columns to commemorate loved ones", he said. He had told CAN the same when they were refused publication in previous years. Hodgson called this stance "hypocritical" because the newspapers' classifieds "often contain legitimately offensive material such as strip joint advertisements".

However, Whitfield called this a "wilful misunderstanding" of his words. "I told them I would be happy to place the advertisement anywhere in the paper but not the 'Deaths' section", he said, stating that they could even publish in the "Personal" section.

Hodgson said they had not tried to publish the advertisements elsewhere in the newspapers upon the first refusal. The advertisements were due to be published on 1 February 2010, when CAN was to lead a "funeral procession" to Parliament in Cape Town in protest against the "thousands of babies, killed by abortion, who have never had a funeral”. //End//

Reagan Malumo
Programme Officer: Media Freedom Monitoring and Research
Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) Regional Secretariat
21 Johann Albrecht St
Private Bag 13386
Windhoek
Namibia
Phone: +264 61 232 975
Fax: +264 61 248 016
Mobile: +264 81 311 2626

Back